Some Jewish History

Reacties · 160 Bekeken

The so-called Jews in modern society have nothing to do with the ancient Hebrews of biblical times, and for decades we never thought of even questioning this basic assumption. It is actually a historical fact that some 95 percent of modern "Jewry" are not of Semetic stock.


Semitism or anti-Semitism and the Jews have almost nothing in common.


Don't swallow what the mass media is telling (dictating) you. Get yourself some history books and the "Encyclopaedia Judaica" for instance, and get your knowledge yourself through your own research.

Des Griffin for example, has done tremendous research for his book "Anti-Semitism and the Babylonian Connection".



As a result of an unrelenting avalanche of (Zionist) propaganda, the vast majority of the people of the world have been misled into believing that the word "Semite" refers almost exclusively to the people who today are known as "Jews".

In fact, few things could be further from the truth.

The words "Semite", "Semitism" and "anti-Semitism" do not even appear in the 1828 edition of Noah Webster's Dictionary of the English language. They were coined only towards the end of the 19th century.

So, who are the "Semites" then?

The Semites, according to the deemed authorative Oxford Universal Dictionairy, 1944 (p.183), are the people stemming from the race of mankind which includes most of the peoples mentioned in Genesis 10 as descended from Shem, son of Noah, i.e., as the Arabs, the Hebrews, Assyrians, Arameans, Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians etc. and speaking a Semetic language as their native tongue.

Most people in the world however, would answer the question whether the modern "Jew" is of Hebrew or Semitic origin with a clear "yes"! False! This is simply not true.

The so-called Jews in modern society have nothing to do with the ancient Hebrews of biblical times, and for decades on end we never thought of even questioning this basic assumption. It is actually a historical fact that some 95 percent of modern "Jewry" are not of Semetic stock. They are of TURKISH (TURKIC) stock - the so-called Khazars.

"The Jews of our times fall into two main divisions: Sephardim and Ashkenazim. The Sephardim are the descendants of the Jews who since antiquity have lived in Spain (Hebrew: Sepharad) untill they were expelled at the end of the fifteenth century.
In the 1960's, the number of Sephardim was estimated at 500,000. The Ashkenazim or Khazar Jews at the same time numbered about 11 million."

"The Khazars came not from Jordan, but from the Volga, not from Canaan, but from the Caucasus. Geneticly they are more related to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
The story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the most cruel hoax that history has ever perpetrated...."
- Arthur Koestler, "The Thirteenth Tribe"

The Jewish Encyclopaedia tells us about the Khazars/Chazars:

"Chazars: A people of TURKISH origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginning of the history of the Jews in Russia. ....driven on by the nomadic tribes of the steppes and by their own desire for plunder and revenge.

In the second half of the sixth century the Chazars moved westwards ....the kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in most of southern Russia long before the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Vangarians (855 AD) ....At this time the kingdom of the Chazars stood of the height of its power and was constantly at war. At the end of the eighth century...the chagan (king) of the Chazars and his grandees, together with a large number of his heathen people, embraced the Jewish religion. (Having the Christians to their left and the Muslims to their right they were asked [ordered] to join either one of those religions, but the Chagan out of protest [yeah right] chose the Jewish religion).

The Jewish population of the entire domain of the Chazars, in the period between the seventh and the eighth century, must have been substantial. About the ninth century it appears as if all the Chazars were Jews and that they had been converted to Judaism only a short time before.

It was one of the successors of Bulan named Obadiah, who regenerated the kingdom and strengthened the Jewish religion. He invited Jewish scholars to settle in his domain and founded synagogues and schools. The people were instructed in the Bible, Mishnah and the Talmud and the divine service of the hazzanim.... In their writings the Chazars used the Hebrew letters.... the Chazars language predominated....

The Russian Vangarians established themselves at Kiev.... until the final conquest of the Chazars by the Russians after a hard fight. Four years later the Russians conquered all the Chazarian territory east of the Azov river. Many members of the Chazarian royal family emigrated to Spain.... Some went to Hungary, but the great mass of people remained in their 'native' country."
(Jewish Encyclopaedia, Volume IV, article on the Chazars.)

After Obadiah came a long succession of chagans (kings), for according to a fundamental law of the state only 'Jewish' rulers were, and are, permitted to ascend the throne, as the Talmud explicitely states.


So, we glean from strictly "Jewish" sources that the vast majority of present day "Jews" cannot claim to be descendents of the original Hebrews and possibly heirs to Palestine. Because of that fact, interestingly, the term "anti-Semitism" does not refer to the modern "Jew".

We are looking here at one of the most cunning ploys ever perpetrated on human kind.

Benjamin Freedman, who was on a first name basis with most of the top Zionists in the 30's and 40's of the last century -always try to keep in mind: Zionists are NOT "Jews"- puts his finger firmly on the true purpose behind the use of the term "anti-Semitism".

He declares:

...."it should be eliminated from the English language. "Anti-Semitism" serves only one purpose today. It is used as a smear word. When so-called Jews feel that anyone opposes any of their objectives, they discredit their victims by applying the word "anti-Semite" or "anti-Semitic" through all the channels they have at their command and under their control".
- "Facts are Facts", Benjamin Freedman

Since the majority of all media worldwide is run by "Jews", i.e., Khazars, controlling public opinion is a breeze.


The most widely known and quite powerful Khazar family is the Rothschild Family, who are named after the red hexagram shield which is the the coat of arms of the Khazars. The same hexagram that would appear on the Israeli flag some two centuries after the Rothschilds established their power.

'Rothschild' (pron. 'road-schield' or 'ross-child') is derived from the German "rotes Schild" = red shield. Their actual name, well, sort of, is Bauer. The Rothschilds aren't Jewish at all, which isn't surprising for Khazars are NOT "Jews".

Same goes for most (practically all) of modern "Jewry". They are not what we are being told they are, they're just named/called that way. "Americans" are not "Americans", they're just named/called that way - except for a very small group, the few natives that have survived, who aren't "American" at all.

When you are a "Jew" you do not stem from a race, you live or were born in the region known as Judea and/or you adhere an atheistic ideology, Judaism. It's like Catholics, they do not exist as a race either, they adhere to a religion: an ideology. Ever heard of the Catholic race? Does that mean "Jews" do not exist as a race all together?
Well, it's like 'being' an American really, you're not, except for a very small minority.

Keep in mind then, that, because (modern) "Jews" are not of Hebrew origin, they never had and never will have a right for claiming the land of Palestine (Sion). The State of Israel as we know it today is absolutely illegal even if the "Jews" would have some Hebrew origin.


To bring it down to the point: the people with the most "anti-Semetic" attitude is probably the modern "Jew" himself. No really!

The "Jews" hate and fight the Arabs -who really are of Semetic stock- whenever and wherever they can. The Arabs themselves are Anti-Khazar, which is a different thing all together, or Anti-Zionist. It's thus the "Jews" who turn out to be the ones who are, in fact, "anti-Semetic". Think about it.

Truth stranger than fiction?


If the "Jews" are "Jewish" by belief and their "belief" is the Talmud (Talmudism) wouldn't they be upset to learn that the racial "anti-Semitism" doctrines of the Talmud actually apply to themselves!?

The "Jews" the culprits?

As you might be able to see, they're just as much a "victim" as anybody else.
"They" just 'managed' to turn the victim part into their - someone's - advantage.

Who might that 'someone' be? And who are "they"? Different (groups of) people? Or maybe the unthinkable: just one (group of) people 'playing' all sides, sides 'created' by "them" in the first place in order to rule/control the world by means of "Devide and Conquer" with the directive to eventually enslave the entire planet on behalf of "the elite"?

Naaaaah, it couldn't be. Could it?

'The Khazarian Mafia' (Dutch) 


- Biblio: